Agentic leaderboard

Best agentic LLMs

Agentic workloads reward long-horizon planning, tool-use and recovery from errors. This ranking weights Terminal-Bench (40%), SWE-bench Verified (30%), Aider Polyglot (15%), LiveBench (10%) and AA Index (5%).

Composite weightingHow this is calculated →

Category leader

#01Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1.

Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...

Composite score
78.7
/ 100

+0.6 vs #2

Ranking

N=45
#ModelCompositeTerminal-BenchSWE-benchAider PolyglotLiveBenchAA Index
0178.769.284.189.189.171
0278.168.983.487.888.870
0376.266.880.485.789.371
0476.167.579.886.487.969
0574.765.679.685.485.565
0674.365.178.284.986.868
0773.663.877.486.885.766
0872.863.176.685.584.965
0972.763.477.284.384.163
1072.462.775.984.685.666
1172.364.374.883.684.364
1272.163.773.585.684.865
1371.562.475.682.983.362
1471.461.875.184.183.864
1570.763.871.780.482.767
1670.761.274.483.383.062
1770.564.573.680.376.857
1870.260.974.381.882.361
1970.160.673.882.782.861
2069.461.274.678.878.757
2169.263.171.978.480.552
2269.159.472.681.982.161
2368.657.873.783.279.359
2468.559.871.580.580.960
2568.560.972.879.878.849
2668.258.372.982.277.458
2767.458.170.879.680.359
2867.157.970.879.877.260
2966.855.171.882.978.260
3066.759.867.176.978.565
3166.656.970.179.879.658
3266.457.070.081.075.060
3366.459.367.878.676.259
3466.356.769.879.279.158
3566.056.469.577.879.858
3665.853.870.782.477.559
3765.757.270.875.575.155
3864.353.970.873.674.161
3962.152.463.577.473.562
4061.549.668.272.174.659
4160.950.864.775.472.453
4259.347.564.374.372.852
4356.546.459.868.772.149
4455.946.857.471.468.548
4552.238.154.771.571.453

How to read the agentic leaderboard

An agent is a model that has to survive its own mistakes. Chat quality barely predicts this. What matters is whether the model can hold a plan across dozens of steps, choose the right tool, read an error message honestly, revise its approach, and stop when the job is done rather than looping until the budget runs out.

Terminal-Bench dominates the weighting because it is the only widely-used evaluation that puts the model in a real shell and grades the end state of the environment. Absolute scores look low compared with other benchmarks, and that is the point: unattended multi-step work is genuinely hard, and a benchmark where everyone scores 90% would tell you nothing. SWE-bench Verified adds a second execution-graded signal with an unforgeable pass criterion, and Aider Polyglot checks that the model's edits are well-formed enough for a tool loop to apply without human repair.

Two failure modes are invisible on this table and worth testing yourself. The first is tool-call reliability — malformed arguments, hallucinated function names, or silently skipping a required call — which sinks agents far more often than weak reasoning does. The second is knowing when to stop: models that cannot recognise completion burn tokens indefinitely and models that give up early leave tasks half-finished, and neither behaviour shows up as a benchmark delta.

Cost behaves differently for agents too. A single agentic task can consume hundreds of thousands of tokens across retries and hidden reasoning, so a model with a higher per-token price but a higher first-pass success rate is frequently cheaper per completed task. Measure completions, not tokens, and pair this leaderboard with the price and throughput tables before you commit to a production model.

Finally, harness matters as much as the model. The same model can move ten points or more depending on retry budget, context management and tool design, so use this ranking to shortlist candidates and then benchmark them inside your own agent loop.

More on how these numbers are produced in the methodology and what each evaluation measures in the benchmark guide. Spotted a score that disagrees with its source? Tell us.

Frequently asked

What is the best agentic AI model?
The top of this table shows the current leader on our agentic composite. Terminal-Bench and SWE-bench Verified dominate the weighting because they measure real multi-step task completion, not one-shot answers.
Are these live scores?
Yes — the underlying benchmark data is refreshed every couple of hours from the public sources listed at the bottom of the page.